Hey!
I wanted to ask anyone who's had warranty cases to speak up about their experiences with different manufacturers.
I've personally owned 3 kayaks and all I've made claims on all 3

I'm a walking bad-luck-machine when it comes to boats.
My oldest boat was a Robson Roadster bought in April 2007. This year in July it got a hole in it while paddling on low volume class 2. It wasn't used all that much, maybe 25 paddling days in total, nothing past class 3+, and I swam maybe twice, the boat never leaving our sight and never receiving extreme abuse (ok it has scratches on the cockpit rim, but nothing deep or drastic).
We took a hard look at the hole, it's not scratch related - round and I can put my smallest finger through it. The hole is under the seat, the plastic seems ridiculously thin! We took it to the dealer and wanted to make a warranty claim because of the thin bottom of the boat, the fact that it got a hole after so little use in such tame conditions, etc. We took another Roadster, much older, to compare the wear and thickness of the plastic. The dealer is reluctant to send it to Robson, convincing us that there is no way that they'll honor the warranty on a boat that has been in a swim situation.
Is that not ridiculous? When one paddles, one can't expect never to swim! and it should be reflected as normal use conditions, at least to some extent. After all, we're not talking about extreme pins in class 5/6 creeks. In fact the hole got busted during normal paddling! Using some scratches on the cockpit rim as an excuse to refuse accepting a claim is unfair practice IMHO. We stuck to our guns, we'll see what Robson will say...
I also have 2 Fluid boats and ran into problems with both. I won't really go into detail on the exact circumstances, but rather on the procedure and atmosphere:
Small problems with outfitting breaking - replacement parts shipped to me at no extra cost (did take some time, though).
Big problems - holes in the hull (Solo on the river, Nemesis due to being from a small badly manufactured batch)- replacement boats, no extra cost!
And all this by email, seeing as I bought the boats in the UK but live in Poland, so couldn't take the "dealer" route. I just sent pictures of the problems b e-mail to the dealer (later correspondence switched to the distributor and later Celliers himself) along with an honest account of what happened and got back solid answers. One claim was problematic as I had lost sight of my Solo after a swim (don't get me wrong - I don't swim that often

), but in the end after further explanations of what the river was like, they are replacing it as well. The whole experience is tuned towards making the customer happy (even when they didn't want to replace the solo, they sent a free replacement center pillar and offered a discount on a new boat) and is very personal and direct. Can't really call it a pleasure - after all, there was drama involved

, but I have great respect for the way the company handled it.
What do you guys think? Where is the line between bad manufacturing and extreme use? What should we absolutely expect/demand whitewater kayaks to handle? After all, if they break with us inside, or leave us stranded somewhere, our health or lives could be on the line...
John
PS I know - I've broken every boat I've owned... :/ bad juju...