support unicef Support American Whitewater!

[please login to make this ad block disappear]
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

Fish Habitat regulations vs. river modifications 18 years 3 months ago #12508

  • chris71
  • chris71's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 183
  • Thank you received: 0
I hope I'm not broaching a taboo topic, but I am interested to hear some comments / experiences.
Having previously worked as a 'stream steward', I can tell you that what we as kayakers consider dangerous wood in an eddy is referred to as desirable 'large woody debris' to a stream keeper...
So... what ramifications to river modifications for paddling have on the environment? A large topic to be sure...
Locally the canoe club worked in tandem with the fish folks and created eddies and even a wave on our river.
But what laws might we run afoul of when trying to create a wave or hole? For sure it isn't legal to bulldoze a local streambed over low water in the hopes of making a wave at high water...
What about removing wood? Safety measure or environmental error?
What do you / your local club do / do not ? How do you approach such issues?




:think:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re:Fish Habitat regulations vs. river modifications 18 years 2 months ago #12621

hi chris!
around middleeurope there are three things mostly determining the river´s environmental value: pureness, pureness and pureness. the struktural quality you speak of, might be considerable if the waterquality is already exessively good. of course this will always be the way scientific environmentalists (the ones with the microscopes) would argue, rather than the environmentally devoted locals (the ones with the 8x20). the foodchain in the river, starting with waterdetermined micoorganisms leads straight and unreplaceably to certain fish and mammal populations suited to the type of the river. only major struktural blocks like steep weirs, untrespassable for watermigrating species, can distort this effect. also long channelsituations can change the riverpopulation---but again only, because it reduces the oxygencontens, just like any input of biomass into the water will do. the long wood can eventually form obstacles in the current with the effect of bubbles and thus raise the oxygenlevel in the water. well --- i´d say: build as many welladjusted obstacles into the river to really get the water mad, whenever you take out the logs, and you do nature and your boatbuddies a real favour.

greetings from east - headsup!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re:Fish Habitat regulations vs. river modification 18 years 1 month ago #13806

  • chris71
  • chris71's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 183
  • Thank you received: 0
interesting to note that someone in the club has been told that they would require Department of Fisheries and Oceans Permit to remove any wood...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.207 seconds

Surfrider Foundation
See the AUP for our Acceptable Use Policy and a Privacy Statement. Verein Playak is responsible for all editorial content on this site (including all graphics). No part of this site may be duplicated in any way without explicit permission from Verein Playak. Verein Playak takes great care to only publish original content, but since part of the content is user generated, we cannot always guarantee this 100%. If you notice any copyright violations, please let the editors know through the contact form and they will take appropriate action immediately. As a news and information platform, we republish small text snippets and thumbnail images, but always link to original content on other sites, and thus aim to adhere to a 'Fair Use' policy. If you believe we violate this policy in any particular case, please contact us directly and we'll take appropriate action immediately.